And when they're not being used to carry the kids about, each is more fun than you might expect too. Both those engines should give the Escape useful performance, a characteristic we found a little lacking in the CX-5 when we drove it-but perhaps that's the price you pay for the greater gas mileage.Įach seats five and offers plenty of space for luggage too, so each will do the "practical family vehicle" task without too much issue. It can't even compete with the 1.6 Ecoboost, rated at up to 178 hp. ![]() That puts it much closer to the Mazda's impressive numbers.īoth the Escape and CX-5 give buyers the option of gas-saving front-wheel drive, or traction-enhancing all-wheel drive for those in tougher climates.įord wins the power race-the Mazda's naturally-aspirated, 155-horsepower 2.0-liter can't compete with the 2.0-liter Ecoboost with up to 240 horsepower. Of course, Ford will offer another option with the Escape-a smaller, more efficient 1.6-liter Ecoboost, capable of 33 mpg highway. That means it uses less gas and pollutes less, but it could also save you a few hundred dollars in gas per year. If you opt for the Mazda's six-speed manual transmission, highway mileage climbs to 35 mpg. ![]() The story is no better on city or highway mileage, where the Ford gets 22 mpg and 30 mpg respectively, to the CX-5's 26 and 32.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |